Chinese Remainder Theorem - Finding The Solution With Basic Algebra and Modular Arithmetic

Finding The Solution With Basic Algebra and Modular Arithmetic

For example, consider the problem of finding an integer x such that

\begin{align} x &\equiv 2 \pmod{3}\\ x &\equiv 3 \pmod{4}\\ x &\equiv 1 \pmod{5}. \end{align}

A brute-force approach converts these congruences into sets and writes the elements out to the product of 3×4×5 = 60 (the solutions modulo 60 for each congruence):

x ∈ {2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 50, 53, 56, 59, …}
x ∈ {3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 43, 47, 51, 55, 59, …}
x ∈ {1, 6, 11, 16, 21, 26, 31, 36, 41, 46, 51, 56, …}.

To find an x that satisfies all three congruences, intersect the three sets to get:

x ∈ {11, …}.

Which can be expressed as

Another way to find a solution is with basic algebra, modular arithmetic, and stepwise substitution.

We start by translating these equivalences into equations for some t, s, and u:

  • Equation 1: x = 2 + 3 × t (mod 3)
  • Equation 2: x = 3 + 4 × s (mod 4)
  • Equation 3: x = 1 + 5 × u (mod 5).

Start by substituting the x from equation 1 into equivalence 2: 2 + 3 × t = 3 (mod 4), hence 3 × t = 1 (mod 4), or t = (1/3) (mod 4) = 3 (mod 4), meaning that t = 3 + 4 × s for integer s.

Plug t into equation 1: x = 2 + 3 × t (mod 3) = 2 + 3 × (3 + 4 × s) (mod 3) = 11 + 12 × s (mod 3).

Plug this x into equivalence 3: 11 + 12 × s = 1 (mod 5). Casting out 5s, we get 1 + 2 × s = 1 (mod 5), or 2 × s = 0 (mod 5), meaning that s = 0 + 5 × u for integer u.

Finally, x = 11 + 12 × s = 11 + 12 × (5 × u) = 11 + (60 × u). Since 60 = lcm(3, 4, 5), we have solutions 11, 71, 131, 191, …

Read more about this topic:  Chinese Remainder Theorem

Famous quotes containing the words finding the, finding, solution, basic, algebra and/or arithmetic:

    “What Romantic terminology called genius or talent or inspiration is nothing other than finding the right road empirically, following one’s nose, taking shortcuts.”
    —Italo Calvino (1923–1985)

    “Why are we so full of restraint? Why do we not give in all directions? Is it fear of losing ourselves? Until we do lose ourselves there is no hope of finding ourselves.”
    —Henry Miller (1891–1980)

    “Who shall forbid a wise skepticism, seeing that there is no practical question on which any thing more than an approximate solution can be had? Is not marriage an open question, when it is alleged, from the beginning of the world, that such as are in the institution wish to get out, and such as are out wish to get in?”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    “The man who is admired for the ingenuity of his larceny is almost always rediscovering some earlier form of fraud. The basic forms are all known, have all been practicised. The manners of capitalism improve. The morals may not.”
    —John Kenneth Galbraith (b. 1908)

    “Poetry has become the higher algebra of metaphors.”
    —José Ortega Y Gasset (1883–1955)

    “Under the dominion of an idea, which possesses the minds of multitudes, as civil freedom, or the religious sentiment, the power of persons are no longer subjects of calculation. A nation of men unanimously bent on freedom, or conquest, can easily confound the arithmetic of statists, and achieve extravagant actions, out of all proportion to their means; as, the Greeks, the Saracens, the Swiss, the Americans, and the French have done.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)