Chinese Remainder Theorem - Finding The Solution With Basic Algebra and Modular Arithmetic

Finding The Solution With Basic Algebra and Modular Arithmetic

For example, consider the problem of finding an integer x such that

\begin{align} x &\equiv 2 \pmod{3}\\ x &\equiv 3 \pmod{4}\\ x &\equiv 1 \pmod{5}. \end{align}

A brute-force approach converts these congruences into sets and writes the elements out to the product of 3×4×5 = 60 (the solutions modulo 60 for each congruence):

x ∈ {2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 50, 53, 56, 59, …}
x ∈ {3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 43, 47, 51, 55, 59, …}
x ∈ {1, 6, 11, 16, 21, 26, 31, 36, 41, 46, 51, 56, …}.

To find an x that satisfies all three congruences, intersect the three sets to get:

x ∈ {11, …}.

Which can be expressed as

Another way to find a solution is with basic algebra, modular arithmetic, and stepwise substitution.

We start by translating these equivalences into equations for some t, s, and u:

  • Equation 1: x = 2 + 3 × t (mod 3)
  • Equation 2: x = 3 + 4 × s (mod 4)
  • Equation 3: x = 1 + 5 × u (mod 5).

Start by substituting the x from equation 1 into equivalence 2: 2 + 3 × t = 3 (mod 4), hence 3 × t = 1 (mod 4), or t = (1/3) (mod 4) = 3 (mod 4), meaning that t = 3 + 4 × s for integer s.

Plug t into equation 1: x = 2 + 3 × t (mod 3) = 2 + 3 × (3 + 4 × s) (mod 3) = 11 + 12 × s (mod 3).

Plug this x into equivalence 3: 11 + 12 × s = 1 (mod 5). Casting out 5s, we get 1 + 2 × s = 1 (mod 5), or 2 × s = 0 (mod 5), meaning that s = 0 + 5 × u for integer u.

Finally, x = 11 + 12 × s = 11 + 12 × (5 × u) = 11 + (60 × u). Since 60 = lcm(3, 4, 5), we have solutions 11, 71, 131, 191, …

Read more about this topic:  Chinese Remainder Theorem

Famous quotes containing the words finding the, finding, solution, basic, algebra and/or arithmetic:

    “One of the many reasons for the bewildering and tragic character of human existence is the fact that social organization is at once necessary and fatal. Men are forever creating such organizations for their own convenience and forever finding themselves the victims of their home-made monsters.”
    —Aldous Huxley (1894–1963)

    “At the age of twelve I was finding the world too small: it appeared to me like a dull, trim back garden, in which only trivial games could be played.”
    —Elizabeth Bowen (1899–1973)

    “The truth of the thoughts that are here set forth seems to me unassailable and definitive. I therefore believe myself to have found, on all essential points, the final solution of the problems. And if I am not mistaken in this belief, then the second thing in which the value of this work consists is that it shows how little is achieved when these problems are solved.”
    —Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951)

    “Man has lost the basic skill of the ape, the ability to scratch its back. Which gave it extraordinary independence, and the liberty to associate for reasons other than the need for mutual back-scratching.”
    —Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)

    “Poetry has become the higher algebra of metaphors.”
    —José Ortega Y Gasset (1883–1955)

    “Your discovery of the contradiction caused me the greatest surprise and, I would almost say, consternation, since it has shaken the basis on which I intended to build my arithmetic.... It is all the more serious since, with the loss of my rule V, not only the foundations of my arithmetic, but also the sole possible foundations of arithmetic seem to vanish.”
    —Gottlob Frege (1848–1925)