Child Support - Child Support Industry

Child Support Industry

Currently the $500 billion child support industry, a small subset of the divorce industry, is being criticized by some groups for its apparent prioritization towards the needs of:

  • State governments (which may collect $2 from the Federal Treasury for every $1 collected from non custodial parent). This claim is disputable. The reference does not support the claim.
  • Perpetuated media stereotypes (violent male roles, victimized, incompetent female roles, and the image that children require support from two parents at all times).
  • The various agencies and legal workers whose operation depends on the existence of child support conflicts.
  • The parent who would be more favored in a ruling to receive payments (such as when a father's small contribution would be pointless to a wealthy mother).

These reasons are generally referred to when discussing the side-effects of child support conflicts such as:

  • The lost opportunity to put the money towards something mutually beneficial to both parents and the child simultaneously.
  • The non-custodial parent becoming equivalent to "a criminal without due process rights" (Involuntary Servitude).
  • The non-custodial parent viewing the custodial parent as someone who uses the law for financial gain ('using' the child's existence as an income stream).
  • The custodial parent receives child support payments tax free - the non-custodial parent must use after-tax money to make payments. This favors the custodial parent, and causes a push by the custodial parent to maximize any child support payments received.
  • There is no mechanism for the non-custodial parent to ensure that any money paid for child support is actually spent on the child.

Read more about this topic:  Child Support

Famous quotes containing the words child, support and/or industry:

    How a child is taught affects his image of himself, which in turn, influences what he will dare and care to try to learn. The interdependence of the two is inescapable.
    Barbara Biber (20th century)

    All experience teaches that, whenever there is a great national establishment, employing large numbers of officials, the public must be reconciled to support many incompetent men; for such is the favoritism and nepotism always prevailing in the purlieus of these establishments, that some incompetent persons are always admitted, to the exclusion of many of the worthy.
    Herman Melville (1819–1891)

    For almost seventy years the life insurance industry has been a smug sacred cow feeding the public a steady line of sacred bull.
    Ralph Nader (b. 1934)