Canonical Ensemble - Deriving The Boltzmann Factor From Ensemble Theory

Deriving The Boltzmann Factor From Ensemble Theory

Let be the energy of the microstate and suppose there are members of the ensemble residing in this state. Further we assume the total number of members in the ensemble, and the total energy of all systems of the ensemble, are fixed, i.e.,

Since systems in the ensemble are indistinguishable with respect to a macrostate, for each set, the number of ways of shuffling systems is equal to

So for a given, there are rearrangements that specify the same state of the ensemble.

The most probable distribution is the one that maximizes . The probability for any other distribution to occur is extremely small in the limit . To determine this distribution, one should maximize with respect to the 's, under two constraints specified above. This can be done by using two Lagrange multipliers and . (The assumption that would be invoked in such calculation, which allows one to apply Stirling's approximation.) The result is

.

This distribution is called the canonical distribution. To determine and, it is useful to introduce the partition function as a sum over microscopic states

Comparing with thermodynamic formulae, it can be shown that, is related to the absolute temperature as, . Moreover the expression

is identified as the Helmholtz free energy . A derivation is given here. Consequently, from the partition function we can obtain the average thermodynamic quantities for the ensemble. For example, the average energy among members of the ensemble is

.

This relation can be used to determine . is determined from

.

Read more about this topic:  Canonical Ensemble

Famous quotes containing the words deriving, factor and/or theory:

    Beware thoughts that come in the night. They aren’t turned properly; they come in askew, free of sense and restriction, deriving from the most remote of sources.
    William Least Heat Moon [William Trogdon] (b. 1939)

    In his very rejection of art Walt Whitman is an artist. He tried to produce a certain effect by certain means and he succeeded.... He stands apart, and the chief value of his work is in its prophecy, not in its performance. He has begun a prelude to larger themes. He is the herald to a new era. As a man he is the precursor of a fresh type. He is a factor in the heroic and spiritual evolution of the human being. If Poetry has passed him by, Philosophy will take note of him.
    Oscar Wilde (1854–1900)

    ... the first reason for psychology’s failure to understand what people are and how they act, is that clinicians and psychiatrists, who are generally the theoreticians on these matters, have essentially made up myths without any evidence to support them; the second reason for psychology’s failure is that personality theory has looked for inner traits when it should have been looking for social context.
    Naomi Weisstein (b. 1939)