Determining Candidate Keys
The previous example only illustrates the definition of a candidate key and not how these are determined in practice. It is important to determine all superkeys, which is especially difficult if the relation represents a set of relationships rather than a set of entities. Therefore it is often useful to attempt to find any "forgotten" superkeys by also determining the functional dependencies. We can derive more superkeys by applying the following rule:
- if S is a superkey and X→Y a functional dependency
- then (S ∖ {Y}) ∪ {X} is also a superkey, where '\' is the set difference.
Consider for example the relation
- Marriage (Husband, Wife, Date)
for which it will trivially hold that
- {Husband, Wife, Date}
is a superkey. If we assume that a certain person can marry at most once on a given date then this implies the functional dependencies:
- {Husband, Date} → Wife
- {Wife, Date} → Husband
In this case, applying the above rule leads to the derivation of the superkeys {Husband, Date} and {Wife, Date} respectively.
Read more about this topic: Candidate Key
Famous quotes containing the words determining, candidate and/or keys:
“The true rule, in determining to embrace, or reject any thing, is not whether it have any evil in it; but whether it have more of evil, than of good. There are few things wholly evil, or wholly good.”
—Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)
“The candidate tells us we are the “backbone of the State,” and we know that it is true, not because we are possessed of certain endowed virtues, but because we are a majority and have the vote.”
—Federal Writers’ Project Of The Wor, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)
“McCoy: That shark’s been following us ever since the surgeon died, waiting for the burial. Couldn’t I have a musket to shoot it, sir?
Fletcher Christian: Take the deck, McCoy. I’ll get the keys to the arms chest.
McCoy: Get two muskets, sir. I’d like to shoot that shark on board.”
—Talbot Jennings (1896–1985)