Status
As well as the five production Burans, there were eight test vehicles. These were used for static testing or atmospheric trials, and some were merely mock-ups for testing of electrical fittings, crew procedures, etc.
| Image | Serial number | Construction Date | Usage | Current status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Space Flight Burans (Production vehicles) | ||||
| Shuttle OK-1K1 — "Buran" (11F35 K1) | 1986 | Unmanned flight (1988) | Destroyed in the Buran hangar collapse in 2002. | |
| Shuttle OK-1K2 — informally "Ptichka" (11F35 K2) | 1988 | 95-97% completed, unused | Property of Kazakhstan, at the Baikonur Cosmodrome, in the MIK Building. | |
| Shuttle OK-2K1 "Baikal" (?) (11F35 K3) | 1990 | Incomplete | Moved from Khimki Reservoir in Moscow to Zhukovsky airfield in order to be prepared for the MAKS-2011 | |
| Shuttle OK-TK(?) (11F35 K4) | 1991 | Incomplete | Partially dismantled, remains outside Tushino Machine Building Plant, near Moscow. | |
| Shuttle 2.03 (11F35 K5) | 1992 | Incomplete | Dismantled. | |
| Aero and Static Tester Burans (Mock-ups) | ||||
| OK-M (later OK-ML-1) | 1982 | Static test | Static test model: parts, normal temperature static loads, moment of inertia, payload mass, interface tests (horizontal and vertical) with the launch vehicle. Located at Baikonur Cosmodrome. | |
| OK-KS (003) | 1982 | Static electrical/integration test | Static test model: electronic and electric. Located at the Energia factory in Korolev | |
| OK-MT (later OK-ML-2) | 1983 | Engineering mock-up | Static test model: documentation, loading methods for liquids and gases, hermetic system integrity, crew entry and exit, manuals. Located at Baikonur Cosmodrome. | |
| OK-GLI (Buran Analog BTS-002) | 1984 | Aero test | Analogue aero test model. Completed 25 aero test flights and 9 taxi tests. Bought by the Technikmuseum Speyer, transported to Germany in 2008. | |
| OK-??? (Model 005?) | Static test | Vibration and vacuum test vehicle. Location unknown. | ||
| OK-TVI | Static heat/vacuum testbed | Static test model: Environmental chamber heat/vacuum, thermal regimes. Location: NIIKhimMash, Moscow. | ||
| OK-??? (Model 008?) | Static test | Vibration and vacuum test vehicle. Location unknown. | ||
| OK-TVA | Static test | Structural test vehicle: loads and stresses, heating and vibration. Located in Gorky Park, Moscow. | ||
| Related Scale Models and Ships | ||||
| BOR-4 | 1982–1984 | Sub-scale model of the Spiral space plane | 1:2 scale model of Spiral space plane. 5 launches. NPO Molniya, Moscow. | |
| BOR-5 ("Kosmos") | 1983–1988 | Suborbital test of 1/8 scale model of Buran | 5 launches, none were reflown but at least 4 were recovered. NPO Molniya, Moscow. | |
| Full-scale crew section | Medical-biological tests | |||
| GLI Horizontal Flight Simulator | Flight control software fine tuning | |||
| Wind tunnel models | Scales from 1:3 to 1:550 | 85 models built | ||
| Gas dynamics models | Scales from 1:15 to 1:2700 | |||
Read more about this topic: Buran Programme
Famous quotes containing the word status:
“Recent studies that have investigated maternal satisfaction have found this to be a better prediction of mother-child interaction than work status alone. More important for the overall quality of interaction with their children than simply whether the mother works or not, these studies suggest, is how satisfied the mother is with her role as worker or homemaker. Satisfied women are consistently more warm, involved, playful, stimulating and effective with their children than unsatisfied women.”
—Alison Clarke-Stewart (20th century)
“Knowing how beleaguered working mothers truly are—knowing because I am one of them—I am still amazed at how one need only say “I work” to be forgiven all expectation, to be assigned almost a handicapped status that no decent human being would burden further with demands. “I work” has become the universally accepted excuse, invoked as an all-purpose explanation for bowing out, not participating, letting others down, or otherwise behaving inexcusably.”
—Melinda M. Marshall (20th century)
“[In early adolescence] she becomes acutely aware of herself as a being perceived by others, judged by others, though she herself is the harshest judge, quick to list her physical flaws, quick to undervalue and under-rate herself not only in terms of physical appearance but across a wide range of talents, capacities and even social status, whereas boys of the same age will cite their abilities, their talents and their social status pretty accurately.”
—Terri Apter (20th century)