Definition
Let V, W and X be three vector spaces over the same base field F. A bilinear map is a function
- B : V × W → X
such that for any w in W the map
- v ↦ B(v, w)
is a linear map from V to X, and for any v in V the map
- w ↦ B(v, w)
is a linear map from W to X.
In other words, if we hold the first entry of the bilinear map fixed, while letting the second entry vary, the result is a linear operator, and similarly if we hold the second entry fixed. Note that if we regard the product V × W as a vector space, then B is not a linear transformation of vector spaces (unless V = 0 or W = 0) because, for example B(2(v,w)) = B(2v,2w) = 2B(v,2w) = 4B(v,w).
If V = W and we have B(v,w) = B(w,v) for all v, w in V, then we say that B is symmetric.
The case where X is F, and we have a bilinear form, is particularly useful (see for example scalar product, inner product and quadratic form).
The definition works without any changes if instead of vector spaces over a field F, we use modules over a commutative ring R. It also can be easily generalized to n-ary functions, where the proper term is multilinear.
For the case of a non-commutative base ring R and a right module MR and a left module RN, we can define a bilinear map B : M × N → T, where T is an abelian group, such that for any n in N, m ↦ B(m, n) is a group homomorphism, and for any m in M, n ↦ B(m, n) is a group homomorphism too, and which also satisfies
- B(mt, n) = B(m, tn)
for all m in M, n in N and t in R.
Read more about this topic: Bilinear Map
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“No man, not even a doctor, ever gives any other definition of what a nurse should be than thisdevoted and obedient. This definition would do just as well for a porter. It might even do for a horse. It would not do for a policeman.”
—Florence Nightingale (18201910)
“Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?
Is God by definition indifferent, beyond us all?
Is the eternal truth mans fighting soul
Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?”
—Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (18391894)