Better Results
It follows from the prime number theorem that for any real k > 1, there exists an n0 such that there is always a prime between n and kn for all n > n0: it can be shown, for instance, that
which implies that π(kn) − π(n) goes to infinity (and in particular is greater than 1 for sufficiently large n).
Non-asymptotic bounds have been also been proved. In 1952, Jitsuro Nagura proved that for n ≥ 25, there is always a prime between n and (1 + 1⁄5)n.
In 1976, Lowell Schoenfeld showed that for n ≥ 2010760, there is always a prime between n and (1 + 1⁄16597)n. In 1998, Pierre Dusart improved the result in his doctoral thesis, showing that for k ≥ 463, pk + 1 ≤ (1 + 1⁄(ln2 pk))pk, and in particular for x ≥ 3275, there exists a prime number between x and (1 + 1⁄(2ln2x))x. In 2010 he proved, that for x ≥ 396738 there is at least one prime between x and (1 + 1⁄(25ln2x))x.
Generalizations of Bertrand's Postulate have also been obtained by elementary methods. (In the following, n runs through the set of positive integers.) In 2006, M. El Bachraoui proved that there exists a prime between 2n and 3n. In 2011, Andy Loo proved that there exists a prime between 3n and 4n. Furthermore, he proved that as n tends to infinity, the number of primes between 3n and 4n also goes to infinity, thereby generalizing Erdős' and Ramanujan's results (see the section on Erdős' theorems above). None of these proofs require the use of deep analytic results.
Read more about this topic: Bertrand's Postulate
Famous quotes containing the word results:
“There is not a single rule, however plausible, and however firmly grounded in epistemology, that is not violated at some time or other. It becomes evident that such violations are not accidental events, they are not results of insufficient knowledge or of inattention which might have been avoided. On the contrary, we see that they are necessary for progress.”
—Paul Feyerabend (19241994)
“How can you tell if you discipline effectively? Ask yourself if your disciplinary methods generally produce lasting results in a manner you find acceptable. Whether your philosophy is democratic or autocratic, whatever techniques you usereasoning, a star chart, time-outs, or spankingif it doesnt work, its not effective.”
—Stanley Turecki (20th century)