Formal Statement
In the formal language of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, the axiom reads:
or in words:
- Given any set A and any set B, if for every set C, C is a member of A if and only if C is a member of B, then A is equal to B.
(It is not really essential that C here be a set — but in ZF, everything is. See Ur-elements below for when this is violated.)
The converse, of this axiom follows from the substitution property of equality.
Read more about this topic: Axiom Of Extensionality
Famous quotes containing the words formal and/or statement:
“This is no argument against teaching manners to the young. On the contrary, it is a fine old tradition that ought to be resurrected from its current mothballs and put to work...In fact, children are much more comfortable when they know the guide rules for handling the social amenities. It’s no more fun for a child to be introduced to a strange adult and have no idea what to say or do than it is for a grownup to go to a formal dinner and have no idea what fork to use.”
—Leontine Young (20th century)
“Truth is that concordance of an abstract statement with the ideal limit towards which endless investigation would tend to bring scientific belief, which concordance the abstract statement may possess by virtue of the confession of its inaccuracy and one-sidedness, and this confession is an essential ingredient of truth.”
—Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914)