Formal Statement of The Theorem
Let be a set of outcomes, a number of voters or decision criteria. We shall denote the set of all full linear orderings of by .
A (strict) social welfare function (preference aggregation rule) is a function which aggregates voters' preferences into a single preference order on . The -tuple of voters' preferences is called a preference profile. In its strongest and simplest form, Arrow's impossibility theorem states that whenever the set of possible alternatives has more than 2 elements, then the following three conditions become incompatible:
- unanimity, or Pareto efficiency
- If alternative a is ranked above b for all orderings, then a is ranked higher than b by . (Note that unanimity implies non-imposition).
- non-dictatorship
- There is no individual i whose preferences always prevail. That is, there is no such that .
- independence of irrelevant alternatives
- For two preference profiles and such that for all individuals i, alternatives a and b have the same order in as in, alternatives a and b have the same order in as in .
Read more about this topic: Arrow's Impossibility Theorem
Famous quotes containing the words formal, statement and/or theorem:
“True variety is in that plenitude of real and unexpected elements, in the branch charged with blue flowers thrusting itself, against all expectations, from the springtime hedge which seems already too full, while the purely formal imitation of variety ... is but void and uniformity, that is, that which is most opposed to variety....”
—Marcel Proust (1871–1922)
“The parent is the strongest statement that the child hears regarding what it means to be alive and real. More than what we say or do, the way we are expresses what we think it means to be alive. So the articulate parent is less a telling than a listening individual.”
—Polly Berrien Berends (20th century)
“To insure the adoration of a theorem for any length of time, faith is not enough, a police force is needed as well.”
—Albert Camus (1913–1960)