The Arithmetical Hierarchy of Sets of Natural Numbers
A set X of natural numbers is defined by formula φ in the language of Peano arithmetic if the elements of X are exactly the numbers that satisfy φ. That is, for all natural numbers n,
where is the numeral in the language of arithmetic corresponding to . A set is definable in first order arithmetic if it is defined by some formula in the language of Peano arithmetic.
Each set X of natural numbers that is definable in first order arithmetic is assigned classifications of the form, and, where is a natural number, as follows. If X is definable by a formula then X is assigned the classification . If X is definable by a formula then X is assigned the classification . If X is both and then is assigned the additional classification .
Note that it rarely makes sense to speak of formulas; the first quantifier of a formula is either existential or universal. So a set is not defined by a formula; rather, there are both and formulas that define the set.
A parallel definition is used to define the arithmetical hierarchy on finite Cartesian powers of the natural numbers. Instead of formulas with one free variable, formulas with k free number variables are used to define the arithmetical hierarchy on sets of k-tuples of natural numbers.
Read more about this topic: Arithmetical Hierarchy
Famous quotes containing the words hierarchy, sets, natural and/or numbers:
“In a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.”
—Laurence J. Peter (1919–1990)
“A continual feast of commendation is only to be obtained by merit or by wealth: many are therefore obliged to content themselves with single morsels, and recompense the infrequency of their enjoyment by excess and riot, whenever fortune sets the banquet before them.”
—Samuel Johnson (1709–1784)
“Man is, then, only disguise, falsehood, hypocrisy—both in himself and in regard to others. He does not wish any one to tell him the truth; he avoids telling it to others; and all these dispositions, so removed from justice and reason, have a natural root in his heart.”
—Blaise Pascal (1623–1662)
“The principle of majority rule is the mildest form in which the force of numbers can be exercised. It is a pacific substitute for civil war in which the opposing armies are counted and the victory is awarded to the larger before any blood is shed. Except in the sacred tests of democracy and in the incantations of the orators, we hardly take the trouble to pretend that the rule of the majority is not at bottom a rule of force.”
—Walter Lippmann (1889–1974)