The Arithmetical Hierarchy of Sets of Natural Numbers
A set X of natural numbers is defined by formula φ in the language of Peano arithmetic if the elements of X are exactly the numbers that satisfy φ. That is, for all natural numbers n,
where is the numeral in the language of arithmetic corresponding to . A set is definable in first order arithmetic if it is defined by some formula in the language of Peano arithmetic.
Each set X of natural numbers that is definable in first order arithmetic is assigned classifications of the form, and, where is a natural number, as follows. If X is definable by a formula then X is assigned the classification . If X is definable by a formula then X is assigned the classification . If X is both and then is assigned the additional classification .
Note that it rarely makes sense to speak of formulas; the first quantifier of a formula is either existential or universal. So a set is not defined by a formula; rather, there are both and formulas that define the set.
A parallel definition is used to define the arithmetical hierarchy on finite Cartesian powers of the natural numbers. Instead of formulas with one free variable, formulas with k free number variables are used to define the arithmetical hierarchy on sets of k-tuples of natural numbers.
Read more about this topic: Arithmetical Hierarchy
Famous quotes containing the words hierarchy, sets, natural and/or numbers:
“In the world of the celebrity, the hierarchy of publicity has replaced the hierarchy of descent and even of great wealth.”
—C. Wright Mills (1916–1962)
“Willing sets you free: that is the true doctrine of will and freedom—thus Zarathustra instructs you.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)
“Show me one thing here on earth which has begun well and not ended badly. The proudest palpitations are engulfed in a sewer, where they cease throbbing, as though having reached their natural term: this downfall constitutes the heart’s drama and the negative meaning of history.”
—E.M. Cioran (b. 1911)
“The principle of majority rule is the mildest form in which the force of numbers can be exercised. It is a pacific substitute for civil war in which the opposing armies are counted and the victory is awarded to the larger before any blood is shed. Except in the sacred tests of democracy and in the incantations of the orators, we hardly take the trouble to pretend that the rule of the majority is not at bottom a rule of force.”
—Walter Lippmann (1889–1974)