Family Division
This subfamily of around 30 languages is divided into three groups according to geography: Plains, Central, and Eastern Algonquian. Only Eastern Algonquian constitutes a true genetic subgroup.
The languages are listed below, following the classifications of Goddard (1996) and Mithun (1999). Extinct languages are marked with †. For dialects and subdialects, consult the separate main articles for each of the three divisions.
- Plains
- 1. Blackfoot
- Arapahoan (including Nawathinehena (†), and Besawunena (†))
- 2. Arapaho proper
- 3. Gros Ventre
- 4. Cheyenne (Šahíyena)
- Central
- 5. Cree–Montagnais–Naskapi
- 6. Menominee
- Ojibwe–Potawatomi
- 7. Ojibwe (Očipwe˙)
- 8. Potawatomi
- 9. Sauk–Fox–Kickapoo
- 10. Shawnee (Ša˙wano˙ki)
- 11. Miami–Illinois (†)
- Eastern
- 12. Mi'kmaq
- Abenaki
- 13. Western Abenaki
- 14. Eastern Abenaki (†)
- 15. Malecite–Passamaquoddy
- 16. Massachusett (†)
- 17. Narragansett (†)
- 18. Mohegan–Pequttôog (†)
- 19. Quiripi-Naugatuck-Unquachog (†)
- 20. Mahican (†)
- Delawarean
- 21. Munsee
- 22. Unami (†)
- 23. Nanticoke–Piscataway (†)
- 24. Carolina Algonquian (†)
- 25. Powhatan (†)
- 26. Etchemin (†)
- 27. Loup A (†)
- 28. Loup B (†)
- 29. Shinnecock (†)
Read more about this topic: Algonquian Languages
Famous quotes containing the words family and/or division:
“It seems to me that upbringings have themes. The parents set the theme, either explicitly or implicitly, and the children pick it up, sometimes accurately and sometimes not so accurately.... The theme may be “Our family has a distinguished heritage that you must live up to” or “No matter what happens, we are fortunate to be together in this lovely corner of the earth” or “We have worked hard so that you can have the opportunities we didn’t have.””
—Calvin Trillin (20th century)
“If the technology cannot shoulder the entire burden of strategic change, it nevertheless can set into motion a series of dynamics that present an important challenge to imperative control and the industrial division of labor. The more blurred the distinction between what workers know and what managers know, the more fragile and pointless any traditional relationships of domination and subordination between them will become.”
—Shoshana Zuboff (b. 1951)