Alf Landon - Electoral History

Electoral History

Kansas gubernatorial election, 1932

  • Alf Landon (R) – 278,581 (34.82%)
  • Harry Hines Woodring (D, Inc.) – 272,944 (34.12%)
  • John Romulus Brinkley (I) – 244,607 (30.58%)

Republican primary for Governor of Kansas, 1934

  • Alf Landon (Inc.) – 233,956 (79.87%)
  • John Romulus Brinkley – 58,983 (20.14%)

Kansas gubernatorial election, 1934

  • Alf Landon (R, Inc.) – 422,030 (53.51%)
  • Omar B. Ketchum (D) – 359,877 (45.63%)
  • George M. Whiteside (Socialist) – 6,744 (0.86%)

Republican presidential primaries, 1936

  • William E. Borah – 1,478,676 (44.48%)
  • Alf Landon – 729,908 (21.96%)
  • Frank Knox – 527,054 (15.85%)
  • Earl Warren – 350,917 (10.56%)
  • Stephen A. Day – 155,732 (4.69%)
  • Warren E. Green – 44,518 (1.34%)
  • Leo J. Chassee – 18,986 (0.57%)
  • Herbert Hoover – 7,750 (0.23%)
  • Frederick Steiwer – 3,285 (0.10%)
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt (write-in) – 1,159 (0.04%)

1936 Republican National Convention

  • Alf Landon – 984 (98.11%)
  • William E. Borah – 19 (1.89%)

United States presidential election, 1936

  • Franklin D. Roosevelt/John Nance Garner (Democratic, Inc.) – 27,752,648 (60.8%) and 523 electoral votes (46 states carried)
  • Alf Landon/Frank Knox (Republican) – 16,681,862 (36.5%) and 8 electoral votes (2 states carried)
  • William Lemke/Thomas C. O'Brien (Union) – 892,378 (2.0%) and 0 electoral votes
  • Norman Thomas/George A. Nelson (Socialist) – 187,910 (0.4%) and 0 electoral votes
  • Earl Browder/James W. Ford (Communist) – 79,315 (0.2%) and 0 electoral votes
  • Others – 53,586 (0.1%) and 0 electoral votes

Read more about this topic:  Alf Landon

Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or history:

    “Power is action; the electoral principle is discussion. No political action is possible when discussion is permanently established.”
    —Honoré De Balzac (1799–1850)

    “The history of work has been, in part, the history of the worker’s body. Production depended on what the body could accomplish with strength and skill. Techniques that improve output have been driven by a general desire to decrease the pain of labor as well as by employers’ intentions to escape dependency upon that knowledge which only the sentient laboring body could provide.”
    —Shoshana Zuboff (b. 1951)