History
The 9th Division was formed on 1 October 1898, as a reserve division after the First Sino-Japanese War in Kanazawa, Ishikawa Prefecture. It consisted of troops primarily from the Hokuriku region of Japan, mostly from the prefectures of Ishikawa, Toyama and Fukui.
Under the command of General Oshima Hisao, it joined General Nogi Maresuke's Japanese Third Army at the Siege of Port Arthur in the Russo-Japanese War, where it took massive casualties. Survivors were further mauled at the subsequent Battle of Mukden.
After the Russo-Japanese War, it was assigned to garrison duty in Korea, and elements of the 9th Division participated in the Siberian Intervention.
In January 1932, it participated in the first Shandong Intervention, and from 1935 it was stationed in Manchuria. Elements of the 9th Division were at the Marco Polo Bridge Incident, and the Division subsequently saw combat at the Battle of Shanghai.
The 9th Division was at the Battle of Nanjing, and has been accused of participation in the subsequent Nanjing Massacre. After Nanjing, the 9th Division was in the Battle of Xuzhou before being ordered back to Japan in June 1939. From 1940-1943, the 9th Division was assigned to the Manchukuo garrison under the control of Kwantung Army. After 1943, it was reassigned to the Japanese Thirty Second Army based in Okinawa, where it formed part of the Taiwan garrison.
Read more about this topic: 9th Division (Imperial Japanese Army)
Famous quotes containing the word history:
“I cannot be much pleased without an appearance of truth; at least of possibility—I wish the history to be natural though the sentiments are refined; and the characters to be probable, though their behaviour is excelling.”
—Frances Burney (1752–1840)
“Racism is an ism to which everyone in the world today is exposed; for or against, we must take sides. And the history of the future will differ according to the decision which we make.”
—Ruth Benedict (1887–1948)
“Postmodernism is, almost by definition, a transitional cusp of social, cultural, economic and ideological history when modernism’s high-minded principles and preoccupations have ceased to function, but before they have been replaced with a totally new system of values. It represents a moment of suspension before the batteries are recharged for the new millennium, an acknowledgment that preceding the future is a strange and hybrid interregnum that might be called the last gasp of the past.”
—Gilbert Adair, British author, critic. Sunday Times: Books (London, April 21, 1991)