7.5 Cm L/45 M/16 Anti Aircraft Gun - Service History and Fate

Service History and Fate

A total of 12 production guns were made. Further production was curtailed because of the perceived low risk of war in the 1920s, and when the need for more anti aircraft artillery was obvious in the 1930s, the design was outdated.

The M/16 was employed in static defence of the various military installations in Norway. They were moved around as the priorities shifted, but at the time the Germans invaded Norway on 9 April 1940, six were mounted near Bergen, four were mounted at the Naval base in Horten, and the remaining two were near Oslo along with more modern guns, such as the 7.5 cm L/45 M/32 anti aircraft gun, to defend the capital.

The guns at Horten could have taken part in the battle that took part in the harbour between Norwegian and German ships (see the article on HNoMS Olav Tryggvason for details), but due to unclear lines of command and the unprepared state of the crew, the guns were captured before any shots could be fired in anger.

In Bergen the M/16 was used to try to shoot down German bombers attacking military targets, but the aircraft flew too low for the guns to be of much use. After the main fortification in Bergen surrendered to the Germans, the anti aircraft batteries were ordered to stand down.

In Oslo, the two M/16s were mounted in a battery at Gressholmen - a small island in the harbour - and were ideally placed to take part in the battle for Fornebu. Norwegian sources claim this battery shot down one or two German bombers, despite the fact that the crew was untrained (17 out of the 44 men had been in uniform for only six days) and several became shell shocked or deserted their posts. In addition to this and other problems, one of the guns got jammed early on in the engagement.

The fate of the M/16s after the Germans captured them is unknown, but it is likely they were used by the Germans in Norway during the war.

Read more about this topic:  7.5 Cm L/45 M/16 Anti Aircraft Gun

Famous quotes containing the words service, history and/or fate:

    “Mr. Speaker, at a time when the nation is again confronted with necessity for calling its young men into service in the interests of National Security, I cannot see the wisdom of denying our young women the opportunity to serve their country.”
    —Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973)

    “I assure you that in our next class we will concern ourselves solely with the history of Egypt, and not with the more lurid and non-curricular subject of living mummies.”
    —Griffin Jay, and Reginald LeBorg. Prof. Norman (Frank Reicher)

    “It is not menstrual blood per se which disturbs the imagination—unstanchable as that red flood may be—but rather the albumen in the blood, the uterine shreds, placental jellyfish of the female sea. This is the chthonian matrix from which we rose. We have an evolutionary revulsion from slime, our site of biologic origins. Every month, it is woman’s fate to face the abyss of time and being, the abyss which is herself.”
    —Camille Paglia (b. 1947)