2007 Las Vegas Desert Classic - Results

Results

A random draw was held after each round meaning no seedings were applied.

1st Round
losers £2,000
Wed 4 Jul &
Thu 5 Jul
2nd Round
losers £3,000
Fri 6 Jul
Quarter Finals
losers £5,000
Sat 7 Jul
Semi Finals
losers £7,000
Sun 8 Jul
Final
winner £20,000
runner-up £10,500
Sun 8 Jul
Raymond van Barneveld 6
Kevin Painter 1 v. Barneveld 8
Wayne Mardle 6 Mardle 1
John Ferrell 3 v. Barneveld 10
Steve Beaton 6 Scholten 4
Andy Hamilton 5 Beaton 5
Roland Scholten 6 Scholten 8
Andy Smith 4 v. Barneveld 11
Dennis Smith 6 Part 7
Dennis Priestley 5 D.Smith 8
Darin Young 6 Young 7
Tony Eccles 3 D.Smith 9
Mark Dudbridge 6 Part 10
Phil Taylor 5 Dudbridge 7
John Part 6 Part 8
Steve Maish 4 Raymond van Barneveld 13
Adrian Lewis 6 Terry Jenkins 6
Steve Smith 3 Lewis 8
Mervyn King 6 King 6
Gerry Convery 1 Lewis 8
Peter Manley 6 Manley 10
Vincent van der Voort 4 Manley 8
Colin Osborne 6 Osborne 4
James Wade 5 Manley 8
Gary Mawson 6 T.Jenkins 11
Stuart Holden 2 Mawson 8
Alan Tabern 6 Tabern 6
John Kuczynski 5 Mawson 7
Wes Newton 6 T. Jenkins 10
Colin Lloyd 3 W. Newton 7
Ray Carver 3 T. Jenkins 8
Terry Jenkins 6

Read more about this topic:  2007 Las Vegas Desert Classic

Famous quotes containing the word results:

    How can you tell if you discipline effectively? Ask yourself if your disciplinary methods generally produce lasting results in a manner you find acceptable. Whether your philosophy is democratic or autocratic, whatever techniques you use—reasoning, a “star” chart, time-outs, or spanking—if it doesn’t work, it’s not effective.
    Stanley Turecki (20th century)

    Pain itself can be pleasurable accidentally in so far as it is accompanied by wonder, as in stage-plays; or in so far as it recalls a beloved object to one’s memory, and makes one feel one’s love for the thing, whose absence gives us pain. Consequently, since love is pleasant, both pain and whatever else results from love, in so far as they remind us of our love, are pleasant.
    Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225–1274)

    “The ideal reasoner,” he remarked, “would, when he had once been shown a single fact in all its bearings, deduce from it not only all the chain of events which led up to it but also all the results which would follow from it.”
    Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930)