Road To The Final
-
Pos Name Pld W D L F A +/- BP Pts 1 Crusaders 13 11 1 1 412 210 202 5 51 2 Hurricanes 13 10 0 3 328 226 102 7 47 3 Waratahs 13 9 0 4 362 192 170 9 45 4 Bulls 13 7 1 5 355 290 65 7 38 5 Sharks 13 7 0 6 361 297 64 10 38 6 Brumbies 13 8 1 4 326 269 57 4 38 7 Chiefs 13 7 1 5 325 298 27 6 36 8 Blues 13 6 0 7 290 344 −54 5 29 9 Highlanders 13 6 0 7 228 276 −48 3 27 10 Cheetahs 13 5 0 8 272 367 −95 7 27 11 Stormers 13 4 1 8 263 334 −71 5 23 12 Reds 13 4 0 9 240 320 −80 6 22 13 Cats 13 2 1 10 220 405 −185 5 15 14 Force 13 1 2 10 223 373 −150 4 12
Semi-finals | Final | |||||||
2 | Hurricanes | 16 | ||||||
3 | Waratahs | 14 | ||||||
1 | Crusaders | 19 | ||||||
2 | Hurricanes | 12 | ||||||
1 | Crusaders | 35 | ||||||
4 | Bulls | 15 |
The Crusaders finished top of the table, following a strong season at home and only one loss, away to the Stormers in Cape Town, which ended their 17 game winning streak, and drawing a game in Perth against soon-to-be wooden spooners, the Western Force.
The Hurricanes made the final after back-to-back wins over the Waratahs in round 14, in Sydney, and then the first semi-final, played in Wellington. The Hurricanes finished second on the table, losing only three matches, in the round robin, to the Cheetahs, the Crusaders and the Brumbies. The home semi-final was the first time the Hurricanes franchise hosted a playoffs match.
Read more about this topic: 2006 Super 14 Final
Famous quotes containing the words road and/or final:
“In one notable instance, where the United States Army and a hundred years of persuasion failed, a highway has succeeded. The Seminole Indians surrendered to the Tamiami Trail. From the Everglades the remnants of this race emerged, soon after the trail was built, to set up their palm-thatched villages along the road and to hoist tribal flags as a lure to passing motorists.”
—For the State of Florida, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)
“A poem is like a person. Though it has a family tree, it is important not because of its ancestors but because of its individuality. The poem, like any human being, is something more than its most complete analysis. Like any human being, it gives a sense of unified individuality which no summary of its qualities can reproduce; and at the same time a sense of variety which is beyond satisfactory final analysis.”
—Donald Stauffer (b. 1930)