History
The phones of Luangic-Kisaric continue those of Proto-Malayo-Polynesian according to the following sound changes. In Western Leti, LK */ʔ/ has vanished and LK */a/ from MP *e is manifested as /o/. In Eastern Leti, LK */s/ becomes /h/ and LK */u/ becomes /ɔ/ in the penult before a low vowel.
| Proto-Malayo-Polynesian | Luangic-Kisaric |
|---|---|
| *m | *m |
| *n, *ɲ, *ŋ | *n |
| *t, *Z | *t |
| *k | *ʔ |
| *g | *k |
| *b | *β |
| *z, *d, *D, *R, *r, *j | *r |
| *l | *l, *n |
| *s | *s |
| *w | *w |
| *h, *q, *p, *y | 0 |
| *i, *uy, *ey, *ay | *i |
| *u | *u |
| *e | *e, *a |
| *a, *aw | *a |
Roger Mills suggests that Luangic-Kisaric retained distinct reflexes of PMP *ŋ, on the basis of other languages in the family, and *Z. Moreover, although the status of *Z as a PMP phoneme is unclear — Mills along with John U. Wolff and Robert Blust no longer admit it, realigning it with *z — the Luangic languages have no clear examples of inherited *z, despite numerous examples of *Z > /t/.
Mills explains the metathesis found in consonant-final basis as arising from an original echo vowel added to consonant-final forms, e.g. *kúlit 'skin' > kúliti, after which the original post-tonic vowel was deleted, e.g. yielding kúlti > Leti ulti.
Jonker (1932) was the first full-scale investigation of Leti, based on a native informant and the few 19th-century works on the language then available.
Read more about this topic: Leti Language
Famous quotes containing the word history:
“The principle office of history I take to be this: to prevent virtuous actions from being forgotten, and that evil words and deeds should fear an infamous reputation with posterity.”
—Tacitus (c. 55–117)
“To care for the quarrels of the past, to identify oneself passionately with a cause that became, politically speaking, a losing cause with the birth of the modern world, is to experience a kind of straining against reality, a rebellious nonconformity that, again, is rare in America, where children are instructed in the virtues of the system they live under, as though history had achieved a happy ending in American civics.”
—Mary McCarthy (1912–1989)
“The history of work has been, in part, the history of the worker’s body. Production depended on what the body could accomplish with strength and skill. Techniques that improve output have been driven by a general desire to decrease the pain of labor as well as by employers’ intentions to escape dependency upon that knowledge which only the sentient laboring body could provide.”
—Shoshana Zuboff (b. 1951)